Posts Tagged Movie

Movie Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

rDV7kyzWPor2jdoulS0RAEkKo1_500[1]Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Rating:  4/5

We did get out over the weekend to see the newest Harry Potter movie, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.  Ultimately I found it to be a very good movie, well worth seeing, but one that was in the end merely evocative of the book rather than a true, faithful adaptation of the book.

The movie starts with Headmaster Albus Dumbledore, Harry’s guardian and mentor, arriving to take Harry with him on a trip to recruit a new professor, Horace Slughorn, after which he’s dumped off near the Weasley home prior to heading off to Hogwarts.

Harry Potter’s sixth year at the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry starts painfully, as his attempts to figure out what the secretive Draco Malfoy is up to lead to him getting roughed up fairly badly, even before he gets off the Hogwarts Express.  From there, we’re whirled into the events of the book, with Harry discovering an old Potions textbook heavily annotated with spells and advice from someone enigmatically referring to him- or herself as “The Half-Blood Prince”.

The students plot and scheme with almost equal fervor to both unravel the plans of the Dark Lord Voldemort, and to pair up romantically.  Romances are shuffled and tested as Harry struggles to obtain a very vital memory from Professor Slughorn, a memory he is loathe to part with.

All the standard elements of the Harry Potter movies are here — a Quidditch match, classroom scenes, Professor Snape showing outrageous favoritism to his chosen Slytherin students, Hagrid waxing sentimental over some hideous magical creature only it’s mother (and Hagrid) could ever love, and some magical duelling.

I was disappointed both in scenes left out (anything having to do with Dumbledore’s Army, along with all but two of the Pensieve memories and the funeral at the end) and the new scenes tacked on (the assault on the Weasley home being the worst).  We didn’t see much of anyone but the main three characters, and many of the professors may as well not have been in the movie at all for the minimal screen time they got.

The acting was very good — Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson have matured into excellent actors, and although Rupert Grint’s performances are a bit too slapstick for me, he does have a gift for comedy and reliably gets me to laugh at the appropriate times.  Jim Broadbent as Horace Slughorn stole the show as far as I’m concerned, except when Helena Bonham Carter was chewing scenery as Bellatrix Lestrange.

In the end, though, although I think the movie has many, many strong points and is overall very faithful to the spirit of the novel, I don’t think it stands on its own as an adaptation, as some of the earlier movies did and as the Lord of the Rings movies did.  At best, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is a great vehicle for reminiscence, each scene reminding you of the fuller, more complete events from the book, but forcing you to supply the extra details to knit everything together in your own head.

I’ve talked to a few people who have not read the book but have seen the movie, and their reaction has generally been confusion.  There’s just too much going on in Half-Blood Prince for it all to make it cleanly into a 2-1/2 hour movie.  Thank goodness Deathly Hallows is going to be split into two installments.

Tags: , , ,

Movie Review: The Proposal

TheProposal_02[1]The Proposal

Rating:  4 out of 5 stars

This is a light and light-hearted summer romantic comedy, and for the most part delivers the goods, although it’s not without its problems.

Sandra Bullock plays Margaret Tate, a bitchy Canadian book editor, who terrorizes her serf/employees and walks all over her assistant, Andrew Paxton (Ryan Reynolds).  All this comes to a screeching halt, however, when she’s informed that her visa application has been denied and she’ll be deported to Canada and lose her job unless she comes up with a way to stay in-country.

At that moment, Andrew walks into the office, and Margaret comes up with a plan.  It should be pretty obvious what her plan is.  Margaret and Andrew negotiate terms, and a bargain is struck.

The fly in the ointment is the friendly neighborhood INS agent, who smells fraud and vows to prove the two are in cahoots in order to keep her in the U.S.  In order to get him off their back temporarily, Margaret commits them to flying up to Alaska for his grandma’s 90th birthday party.  Grandma is played by the scene-stealing Betty White, and is as funny as ever in this role.

While in Alaska, they meet the rest of Andrew’s family, declare their engagement, and slowly fall for each other for real as they fake it for the family’s benefit.

I would apologize for blowing the plot, but it’s a summer romantic comedy.  They’re as predictable as sunrise, and this one is no exception.  The chemistry is good, the writing is pretty sharp and funny, the supporting cast is good, there’s an interesting twist in that the normal gender roles are somewhat reversed here, and ultimately that’s enough to make it a very enjoyable movie.

On the negative side, much of the time the movie seemed choppy and over-edited, and I got the sensation that some fairly important scenes got left on the cutting-room floor.  The excellent Mary Steenburgen and Craig T. Nelson were underused, and I thought quite a few opportunities for exploring Margaret and Andrew’s relationship in more depth were missed.

But overall this is still a good movie, well worth seeing if you get a chance.

Tags: , ,

Movie Review: Up

up_pixar-2[1]Up — Disney/Pixar Studios.  Rating:  5/5 stars

Sunday we went to see Up, the new movie from Pixar.  I went in with high expectations, considering the massive 98% positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.  It didn’t disappoint.

Up is the story of Carl Fredericksen, an elderly man who dreamed of exotic, foreign adventures as a boy but who never actually went to the places he dreamed about.

Similar to the otherwise totally different Watchmen, Up uses an emotionally powerful montage approach at the beginning of the film to bring you up to speed — in this case, up to speed with the character of Carl, who without the background might appear like an irredeemable jerk.

But with that background, you can’t help but sympathize with Carl in the situation he finds himself in — to sympathize, and when he finally casts off into the unknown on the marvelous adventure of his dreams, to suspend disbelief and take flight along with him.

There’s plenty here for everyone; although it’s a cliche, it should appeal to folks from six to 106.  As my friend Forest said, “If you understand English, you’ll like this movie.”  And in some cases, that might not even be a requirement.  The movie is visually stunning as well, and the probably-not-quite-aged-two toddler sitting next to us in the theater was remarkably quiet and raptly watching the beautifully-colored scenes throughout the movie.  I think Thomas may have made more noise than she did.

There is lush wilderness, a pack of talking dogs, a hilarious mother bird, a nuanced villain, and plenty of action and laughs.  But under the surface there’s a lot more going on.  There are strong yet subtle messages about how life works — relationships, materialism, reputation, what’s important and what’s not — and about the dangers of obsession and trying to lock yourself away from the curveballs and change-ups you encounter in life.

In the end, Up is a fine adventure — possibly not the same one you thought you were going to get going into the theatre, but maybe all the better for it.  See it!

Tags: , ,

The Quern is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache